korean unification studies

the DMZ will not last forever… or will it?

korean unification studies random header image

Clinton’s freeze versus Bush’s disablement

November 28th, 2007 · 4 Comments

Kenneth Quinones, former US State Department North Korea specialist, has a very interesting piece comparing the ‘freeze’ on North Korean nuclear facilities that the Clinton administration sought and the ‘disablement’ on North Korean nuclear facilities that the Bush administration is seeking. Here is a taste:

In November 1994, I accompanied the first U.S. delegation to visit the Yongbyon Nuclear Research Center. As soon as the Agreed Framework had been signed on October 21, 1994, I was directed, as the North Korea Affairs officer, to arrange for a group of American officials and scientists to visit North Korea at the earliest possible time…Once the two sides had agreed upon a general outline of the procedures for the “freeze”, I was put in charge of implementing the agreement. This required that I live and work, together with a small number of American technicians, at the Yongbyon nuclear facility for six months in 1995: January, June, July, August, September and October. This experience enables me to compare the Bush Administration’s “disablement” with the Clinton Administration’s “freeze” of nuclear activities at North Korea’s Yongbyon nuclear facility, located approximately 100 kilometers north of Pyongyang.

The Bush Administration’s efforts during the past seven years thus far have accomplished no more than the Clinton Administration’s eighteen months of negotiations accomplished. The difference is that at the end of the eighteen months, the Clinton Administration had a comprehensive agreement with North Korea to end its nuclear program. The Bush Administration, while to be commended for having finally given up its futile coercive tactics and all or nothing goal, is still striving to forge a negotiated end to North Korea’s nuclear programs.

The article is part of the IFES Policy Forum series and is well worth a read!!!

Share This
Sphere: Related Content

Tags: Nuclear Issues

4 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Richardson // Nov 30, 2007 at 11:21 pm

    You’ve got to take what Quinones with a grain of salt – he is, after all, attempting to protect his own legacy.

    The sum of what the Clinton admin accomplished is this; a freeze at Yongbyon, followed by sweeping reporting of the HEU program under the table and leaving a huge steaming pile of a mess for the next administration. Some legacy.

  • 2 DPRK Studies // Nov 30, 2007 at 11:56 pm

    Which Useless Deal with North Korea Was Best…

    Kenneth Quinones, a former DoS official intimately involved in the 1994 Agreed Framework, compares the Clinton and Bush deals with North Korea (PDF), concluding that the former accomplished more in 18 months than the latter did in 7 years. Quinones, of…

  • 3 BC // Dec 1, 2007 at 11:45 am

    I think both the Bush and Clinton legacies will be viewed similarly. During both they have had the chance to put an end to the North Korean regime. But both of them chose instead to focus on other issues and leave the crapfight that the end will be, to someone else.

  • 4 ROK Drop Weekly Linklets - 02DEC07 at ROK Drop // Dec 2, 2007 at 4:14 am

    [...] has past away.  One Free Korea has a great tribute to the Congressman. -  Nothing like more Clinton era revisionism of their North Korea policy.-  This just makes you wonder how this would be handled if it was a [...]

Leave a Comment